Classification of Gingival Recession: Evolution from Miller’s 1985 Classification to the 2018 Revisited System
PDF

Keywords

classification
etiology
gingival recession
interdental papilla
mucogingival junction
prevalence

Abstract

Gingival recession is a widely prevalent mucogingival deformity with esthetic and functional consequences. Since Sullivan and Atkins first proposed a classification in 1968, numerous systems have attempted to standardize diagnosis and prognosis, including Miller’s widely adopted marginal tissue recession (1985) classification. As Miller’s system expanded the horizon of recession classification beyond shape and size, it also provided prognostic guidance for root coverage. However, limitations such as difficulty in identifying the mucogingival junction and ambiguity between classes had prompted further refinements. Cairo’s 2011 Recession Type system improved prognostic accuracy by incorporating interproximal attachment loss, and the 2017 World Workshop extended the treatment-oriented classification by integrating recession type, gingival phenotype, and root surface features into a 4×5 matrix. In 2018, Miller revisited his classification system again after 3decades, incorporating papilla dimensions and emphasizing the role of attached gingiva, cautioning against oversimplification in then newer popular systems. Together, the evolution of these classification systems also portrays the evolution of periodontology from mucogingival surgery to perioplastic surgery era. This article outlines the basis, drawbacks and limitations of various classification systems proposed to classify gingival recession over time.

PDF

References

Jepsen S, Caton JG, Albandar JM, Bissada NF, Bouchard P, Cortellini P, et al. Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and developmental and acquired conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 3 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45:S219-29.

Wennström JL. Mucogingival therapy. Ann Periodontol. 1996;1(1):671-701.

Consensus Report Mucogingival Therapy. Ann Periodontol. 1996;1:702-06.

Newman MG, Klokkevold PR, Elangovan S, Hernandez-Kapila YL, Carranza FA, Takei HH. Newman and Carranza’s Clinical Periodontology and Implantology. 14th ed. Elsevier; 2024.

Chambrone L, Avila-Ortiz G. An evidence-based system for the classification and clinical management of non-proximal gingival recession defects. J Periodontol. 2021;92(3):327-35.

Takei HH, Scheyer ET, Azzi RR, Allen EP, Han TJ. Periodontal Plastic and Esthetic Surgery In:Newman MG, Klokkevold PR, Elangovan S, Hernandez-Kapila YL, Carranza FA, Takei HH. Newman and Carranza’s Clinical Periodontology and Implantology. 14th ed. Elsevier; 2024775-779

Löe H, Theilade E, Jensen SB. Experimental gingivitis in man. J Periodontol. 1965;36:177-87.

Hirschfeld I. A study of skulls in the American Museum of Natural History in relation to periodontal disease. Journal of Dental Research. 1923 Dec;5(4):241-65.

Yadav VS, Gumber B, Makker K, Gupta V, Tewari N, Khanduja P, Yadav R. Global prevalence of gingival recession: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Diseases. 2023;29(8):2993-3002.

Romandini M, Soldini MC, Montero E, Sanz M. Epidemiology of mid-buccal gingival recessions in NHANES according to the 2018 World Workshop Classification System. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2020;47(10):1180-90.

Rijal AH, Napit R, Chhetri PM, Pandey S, Poudel S, Ghimire P, Adhikari B, Lamichhane S, Humagain M. Prevalence of Gingival Recession in the Nepalese Population Visiting Tertiary Care Hospital. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2025;63(286):396-400

Humagain M, Kafle D. The evaluation of prevalence, extension and severity of gingival recession among rural Nepalese adults. Orthod J Nepal. 2013;3(1):41-46

Shakya S, Pradhan S, Gorkhali RS, Giri M, Sushil K, Gupta S. Prevalence and aetiology of gingival recession in mandibular anterior teeth. J Nepal Dent Assoc. 2017;17(1):1-7.

Shrestha E, Singh H, Kafle S, Rai V. Prevalence of Gingival Recession and Risk Factors in Dental Hospital Population of Chitwan, Nepal. J Univ Coll Med Sci. 2025;13(01):30-4.

Sullivan HC, Atkins JH. Free autogenous gingival grafts. I. Principles of successful grafting. Periodontics. 1968;6(3):121-9.

Mlinek A, Smukler H, Buchner A. The use of free gingival grafts for the coverage of denuded roots. J periodontol. 1973;44(4):248-54.

Jain S, Kaur H, Aggarwal R. Classification systems of gingival recession: An update. Indian journal of dental sciences. 2017;9(1):52-9.

Benque EP, Brunel G, Gineste M, Colin L, Duffort J, Fonvielle E. Gingival recession. Parodontol J. 1984;3:207-41

Miller PD. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1985;5(2):8–13.

Smith RG. Gingival recession Reappraisal of an enigmatic condition and a new index for monitoring. J Clin Periodontol. 1997;24(3):201-5.

Nordland WP, Tarnow DP. A classification system for loss of papillary height. J Periodontol. 1998;69(10):1124-6.

Mahajan A. Mahajan's modification of the Miller's classification for gingival recession. Dental Hypotheses. 2010;1(2):45-50.

Cairo F, Nieri M, Cincinelli S, Mervelt J, Pagliaro U. The interproximal clinical attachment level to classify gingival recessions and predict root coverage outcomes: an explorative and reliability study. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38(7):661-6.

Rotundo R, Mori M, Bonaccini D, Baldi C. Intra-and inter-rater agreement of a new classification system of gingival recession defects. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011;4(2):127-33

Kumar A, Masamatti SS. A new classification system for gingival and palatal recession. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2013;17(2):175-81.

Bhusari P, Agrawal N, Upadhyay S, Verma S, Jain A, Jaroli S. Classification & prevalence of dental surface defects in areas of gingival recession-a clinical study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(7):ZF01- 04

Pini-Prato G. The Miller classification of gingival recession: limits and drawbacks. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2011;38(3):243-5

Miller PD. Miller Classification of Marginal Tissue Recession Revisited After 35 Years. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2018;39(8):514-20

Pini Prato G, Di Gianfilippo R. On the value of the 2017 classification of phenotype and gingival recessions. J Periodontol. 2021;92(5):613-8.