Keywords
Immediate implant placement
immediate provisionalisation
retained deciduous molar
immediate provisionalisation
retained deciduous molar
Abstract
Immediate implant placement offers advantages such as reduced number of appointments and overall treatment time, preservation of bone at the implant site and optimal soft tissue aesthetics – thus, increased patient acceptance. This report presents a case where immediate implant with immediate provisionalisation was done for right mandibular second deciduous molar. After extracting the ankylosed tooth atraumatically, endosseous root-form titanium implant of 5.0 X 10.0 mm was placed and provisionalisation was done using the patient’s own tooth. After four months, final prosthesis was delivered. Soft and hard tissue integrity after six months of prosthesis delivery was well-maintained.
References
Beschnidt SM, Cacaci C, Dedeoglu K, Hildebrand D, Hulla H, Iglhaut G, et al. Implant success and survival rates in daily dental practice: 5-year results of a non-interventional study using CAMLOG SCREW-LINE implants with or without platform-switching abutments. Int J Implant Dent. 2018 Dec;4(1):33.
Hammerle C, Chen S, Wilson T. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Feb 1;19 Suppl:26-8.
Gamborena I, Sasaki Y, Blatz MB. Predictable immediate implant placement and restoration in the esthetic zone. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Jan 1;33(1):158-72.
Araújo MG, Silva CO, Misawa M, Sukekava F. Alveolar socket healing: What can we learn? Periodontol 2000. 2015 Jun 1;68(1):122-34.
Teng F, Du FY, Chen HZ, Jiang RP, Xu TM. Three-dimensional analysis of the physiologic drift of adjacent teeth following maxillary first premolar extractions. Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 1;9(1):14549.
Schoenbaum T, Chang TL, Chung E, Klokkevold P. Prosthetic considerations for implant treatment. Newman MG, Takei HH, Klokkevold, PR, Carranza FA, editors. Newman and Carranza's Clinical Periodontology. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2018. p. 769-83.
Hinds K. Custom impression coping for an exact registration of the healed tissue in the aesthetic implant restoration. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997 Dec 1;17:584-91.
Armitage GC, Xenoudi P. Post-treatment supportive care for the natural dentition and dental implants. Periodontol 2000. 2016 Jun 1;71(1):164-84.
Hammerle C, Chen S, Wilson T. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Feb 1;19 Suppl:26-8.
Gamborena I, Sasaki Y, Blatz MB. Predictable immediate implant placement and restoration in the esthetic zone. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Jan 1;33(1):158-72.
Araújo MG, Silva CO, Misawa M, Sukekava F. Alveolar socket healing: What can we learn? Periodontol 2000. 2015 Jun 1;68(1):122-34.
Teng F, Du FY, Chen HZ, Jiang RP, Xu TM. Three-dimensional analysis of the physiologic drift of adjacent teeth following maxillary first premolar extractions. Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 1;9(1):14549.
Schoenbaum T, Chang TL, Chung E, Klokkevold P. Prosthetic considerations for implant treatment. Newman MG, Takei HH, Klokkevold, PR, Carranza FA, editors. Newman and Carranza's Clinical Periodontology. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2018. p. 769-83.
Hinds K. Custom impression coping for an exact registration of the healed tissue in the aesthetic implant restoration. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997 Dec 1;17:584-91.
Armitage GC, Xenoudi P. Post-treatment supportive care for the natural dentition and dental implants. Periodontol 2000. 2016 Jun 1;71(1):164-84.